Deep Learning Methods for Chest Disease Detection Using Radiography Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
X-ray images are the most widely used medical imaging modality. They are affordable, non-dangerous, accessible, and can be used to identify different diseases. Multiple computer-aided detection (CAD) systems using deep learning (DL) algorithms were recently proposed to support radiologists in identifying different diseases on medical images. In this paper, we propose a novel two-step approach for chest disease classification. The first is a multi-class classification step based on classifying X-ray images by infected organs into three classes (normal, lung disease, and heart disease). The second step of our approach is a binary classification of seven specific lungs and heart diseases. We use a consolidated dataset of 26,316 chest X-ray (CXR) images. Two deep learning methods are proposed in this paper. The first is called DC-ChestNet. It is based on ensembling deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) models. The second is named VT-ChestNet. It is based on a modified transformer model. VT-ChestNet achieved the best performance overcoming DC-ChestNet and state-of-the-art models (DenseNet121, DenseNet201, EfficientNetB5, and Xception). VT-ChestNet obtained an area under curve (AUC) of 95.13% for the first step. For the second step, it obtained an average AUC of 99.26% for heart diseases and an average AUC of 99.57% for lung diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".