MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376130727 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2023.103333

WetMapFormer: A unified deep CNN and vision transformer for complex wetland mapping

2023· article· en· W4376130727 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ali Jamali, Swalpa Kumar Roy, Pedram Ghamisi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkWetlandArtificial intelligenceDeep learningComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeographyRemote sensingCartographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ramsar Convention of 1971 encourages wetland preservation, but it is unclear how climate change will affect wetland extent and related biodiversity. Due to the use of the self-attention mechanism, vision transformers (ViTs) gain better modeling of global contextual information and become a powerful alternative to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). However, ViTs require enormous training datasets to activate their image classification power, and gathering training samples for remote sensing applications is typically costly. As such, in this study, we develop a deep learning algorithm called (WetMapFormer), which effectively utilizes both CNNs and vision transformer architectures for precise mapping of wetlands in three pilot sites around the Albert county, York county, and Grand Bay-Westfield located in New Brunswick, Canada. The WetMapFormer utilizes local window attention (LWA) rather than the conventional self-attention mechanism for improving the capability of feature generalization in a local area by substantially reducing the computational cost of vanilla ViTs. We extensively evaluated the robustness of the proposed WetMapFormer with Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellite data and compared it with the various CNNs and vision transformer models which include ViT, Swin Transformer, HybridSN, CoAtNet, a multimodel network, and ResNet, respectively. The proposed WetMapFormer achieves F-1 scores of 0.94, 0.94, 0.96, 0.97, 0.97, 0.97, and 1 for the recognition of aquatic bed, freshwater marsh, shrub wetland, bog, fen, forested wetland, and water, respectively. As compared to other vision transformers, the WetMapFormer limits receptive fields while adjusting translational invariance and equivariance characteristics. The codes will be made available publicly at https://github.com/aj1365/WetMapFormer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207