Initial status and change in cognitive function mediate the association between academic education and physical activity in adults over 50 years of age.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Higher levels of academic education are associated with higher levels of physical activity throughout the lifespan. However, the mechanisms underlying this association are unclear. Cognitive functioning is a potential mediator of this association because higher levels of education are associated with better cognitive function, which is related to greater engagement in physical activity. Here, we used large-scale longitudinal data from 105,939 adults 50 years of age or older (55% women) from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe to investigate whether initial status and change in cognitive function mediate the relationship between education and change in physical activity. Education and physical activity were self-reported. Cognitive function was assessed based on delayed recall and verbal fluency. Academic education was assessed at the first measurement occasion. The other measures were collected seven times between 2004 and 2019. The mediating role of cognitive function was tested using longitudinal mediation analyses combined with growth curve models. We found that higher levels of education were associated with higher levels and slower decreases in cognitive function, which in turn predicted a lower decrease in physical activity across time. These results support the presence of an indirect effect of education on physical activity trajectories by affecting the intercept and slope of cognitive function. Specifically, these findings suggest that both the initial status and change in cognitive function mediate the association between academic education and change in physical activity. In addition, results revealed that, across the aging process, differences in cognitive function and physical activity widen between the low and high educated. In other words, this study demonstrates the long-lasting effect of education on cognitive function and physical activity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".