Protection sociale des travailleurs du secteur informel au Cameroun : une analyse de la demande
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est d’examiner la souscription des entrepreneurs du secteur informel au système public de protection sociale au Cameroun. L’analyse porte sur un échantillon de 4598 promoteurs d’unités de production informelle (UPI), issu de la 2nde phase de la deuxième enquête sur l’emploi et le secteur informel au Cameroun (INS, 2010). En s’inspirant de la revue de la littérature économique, les résultats économétriques obtenus à l'aide de l’estimation d’un modèle probit avec biais de sélection révèlent que les entrepreneurs du secteur informel seront moins enclins à adhérer à un système public de protection sociale offrant les prestations sociales ci-après: l’assurance vieillesse, l’assurance invalidité, l’allocation familiale et l’allocation maladie professionnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".