MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multiport DC-DC Converter for Integrating Energy Systems in All-Electric Vehicles

2023· article· en· W4376134298 on OpenAlexaff
Immanuel N. Jiya, Pasan Gunawardena, Huynh Van Khang, Nand Kishor, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversitetet i AgderNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsEnergy storageSupercapacitorRenewable energyVoltageAutomotive industryComputer scienceElectrical engineeringInductorElectric vehicleCluster (spacecraft)Energy (signal processing)Computer data storageElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringPower (physics)Computer hardwareCapacitancePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a new non-isolated multiport dc-dc converter (MPC) of non-inverting buck-boost configuration is proposed for integrating multiple energy resources in automotive applications. A typical example of such automotive application is an electric vehicle (EV), powered by one or more renewable energy sources (RESs) and consisting of one or more energy storage systems (ESSs), e.g. batteries and supercapacitors. The inputs to the MPC are clustered based on source or storage and integrated using uni- or bi-directional switches, respectively. It is capable of bi-directional operation between the storage cluster and the dc link, allowing for a simultaneous transfer of energy from more than one source of varying voltage levels (irrespective of its' cluster) to the dc link. The proposed MPC is analysed for four inputs, comprising of two per cluster in this paper. As compared to existing MPCs in literature, the proposed converter utilizes a fixed number (two) of inductors and is robust such that it requires only one additional switch to integrate any extra energy storage or source in a respective cluster. Different operating modes of the proposed MIC are numerically verified and validated on OPAL-RT's OP5700 hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207