MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376141380 · doi:10.1093/bjs/znad101.001

O001 A novel molecular HLA mismatch algorithm to identify transplant patients at low risk of primary alloimmunity

2023· article· en· W4376141380 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hannah C. Copley, Chris Wiebe, John Kim, Miriam Manook, Edward H. Williams, Irina Mohorianu, Dieter Kabelitz, Catherine E. Kling, Andrew R. Leach, Peter Nickerson, Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of surgery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAlloimmunityCohortHuman leukocyte antigenAlgorithmKidney transplantationInternal medicineTransplantationRisk stratificationOncologyImmunologyAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction There is an unmet need for prognostic biomarkers for alloimmune risk stratification to guide personalised recipient care kidney transplantation. Methods We used three molecular Mismatch (molMM) algorithms - Amino-Acid-Mismatch-Score (AAMS), Electrostatic-Mismatch-Score (EMS3D) and NetMHCIIpan in a dataset of patients receiving standardised donor lymphocyte injections to predict de-novo donor-specific-antibody (dnDSA) at the individual HLA level (n=665). Risk thresholds were derived for HLA-DR/DQ mismatch and algorithms combined. External validation was performed in two extensively-phenotyped kidney transplant cohorts (Manitoba, n=856, Denver n=404) and in the NHSBT kidney transplant registry (2000–2020, n=27,028). Results External validation (Manitoba cohort, 10-year follow-up) showed all algorithms predicted dnDSA development using experimentally derived HLA-DR/DQ molMM risk thresholds (HLA-DQ AUC: 0.78-0.80; HLA-DR AUC:0.76-0.81). AAMS and EMS3D had improved risk stratification (low-medium-high risk groups for HLA-DR+DQ dnDSA) vs NetMHCIIpan (p=NS). A combined AAMS+EMS3D molMM algorithm further improved discrimination and identified a large patient cohort (15.4% patients) at very-low risk of Class-II dnDSA (1.3% at 10 years). Multivariate analysis confirmed correlation with primary alloimmune events (dnDSA p<0.001, TCMR p<0.001, ABMR p=0.0049) and all-cause graft loss (p=0.0038). Further external validation of the combined molMM algorithm in an ethnically diverse cohort (Denver) confirmed the dnDSA risk association (p<0.0001), and in the UK registry cohort confirmed significant association with all-cause graft loss (p<0.001). Conclusion We developed and validated a novel molMM algorithm, incorporating information from HLA amino-acid sequence and tertiary structurebthat may be used as a prognostic biomarker of primary alloimmunity risk and to enrich prospective clinical trials in kidney transplantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of surgerySame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207