Bibliographic record
Abstract
Promišljajući o naratologiji i njezinu odnosu s drugim analitičkim i metodološkim modelima unutar humanističkih znanosti, u radu se analizira položaj likova pripovijetke Albert Nobbs (1918) irskog pisca Georgea Moorea u odnosu na istoimenu filmsku adaptaciju redatelja Rodriga Garcíje (2011). Budući da dva različita medija pružaju i različite naratološke uvide u problematiku pripovijesti, u radu se polazi od pretpostavke da se i identitet likova, prije svega naslovnog junaka, oblikuje drukčije u filmu, odnosno u književnom tekstu. Takva je razlika najviše uočljiva u kategoriji rodnog identiteta, odnosa muško/žensko, ali i u prisutnosti latentne homoseksualnosti (lezbijska žudnja), što svakako djeluje radikalno s obzirom na to da se radnja odvija u XIX. st. Uz promišljanja suvremenih teoretičara rodnog identiteta, u radu će se pokušati analizirati dva naratološki različita pristupa oblikovanju identiteta čime se stječe dojam da se identitet Alberta Nobbsa svakovrsnim lomovima i okolnostima zapravo reflektira kao trajna potraga za svojom stabilnošću koja nerijetko rezultira sukobom sa samim sobom, ali i konzervativnim društvom koje ga okružuje.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.022 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".