MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376226662 · doi:10.1007/s00520-023-07807-2

Correction to: Barrier films and dressings for the prevention of acute Radiation dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2023· review· en· W4376226662 on OpenAlexaff
Jolien Robijns, Michele Aquilano, Suvam Banerjee, Saverio Caini, Julie Ryan Wolf, Corina van den Hurk, Mara Beveridge, Henry Lam, Pierluigi Bonomo, Edward Kai‐Hua Chow, Tara Behroozian

Bibliographic record

VenueSupportive Care in Cancer · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisNursing researchDermatologyPain medicineSystematic reviewSkin barrierMEDLINEMedical physicsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.127
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.127
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.008
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSupportive Care in CancerSame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207