Thermodynamic Modeling and Multi‐Objective Optimization of a New System Presented for Reutilization of the Lost Heat in Combined‐Cycle Power Plants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In combined‐cycle power plants, a large amount of thermal energy is lost when the boiler and steam unit are out of order and the gas unit is operated in single mode. For the first time, this work suggests every combined‐cycle power plants should be equipped with this kind of energy system to recover the waste heat by producing hydrogen and generating electricity. This system combines a Rankine cycle with a thermoelectric generator, a finned‐tube heat exchanger, and a proton exchange membrane to produce hydrogen. Having been designed, the suggested energy system is assessed by energy, exergy, and exergo‐economy laws. Furthermore, the impacts of some effective factors on the efficiency and the costs are precisely analyzed. Eventually, the presented system is optimized considering two main purposes of exergy efficiency and costs. The achieved results show that the proposed system can effectively link to the gas unit to restore and even save the lost thermal energy in the single‐mode condition. The conducted optimization attenuates the objective parameter of exergy efficiency from 48.39% to 41.65% and diminishes the costs from 550.14 to 480.82 $ GJ −1 . Eventually, the optimization causes to rise from 1.2 to 1.32 kg h −1 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it