Vehicular Crowdsensing with High-Mileage Vehicles: Investigating Spatiotemporal Coverage Dynamics in Historical Cities with Complex Urban Road Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Vehicular crowdsensing (VCS) can be a cost-effective solution to gather data in urban environments, leveraging the onboard sensors of modern vehicles moving around the city. Many experimental studies have proven that high-mileage vehicles, such as taxis, can be effectively used for VCS. However, these studies have been mostly carried out in cities with regular, grid-based, road networks. Conversely, little work has been conducted to assess the suitability of VCS in cities with more complex urban road networks, such as historical ones. Goal. As a step towards filling this gap, the present study investigates the feasibility of using different-sized fleets of taxis to crowdsense information in the urban areas of the historical cities of Porto (Portugal) and Rome (Italy), whose road networks evolved over the centuries and feature a complex topology. Data and Methodology. This work leverages massive real-world datasets of taxi trajectories collected over three contiguous weeks in the cities of Porto and Rome to estimate the spatiotemporal coverage achievable by different-sized fleets of taxis if they were used for VCS. Indeed, using these trajectories, several simulations were conducted, considering four sizes of taxi fleets, ranging from 50 to 400 vehicles, for both cities. The achievable spatiotemporal road network coverage metrics were computed at a fine-grained scale of single road segments. Results. Results show that the achievable coverage in both historical cities exhibits very similar trends, with as few as 50 vehicles being capable of visiting a relevant part of the road network at least once in the considered time frame. As expected, increasing the number of involved vehicles improves spatial and temporal coverage. Still, time gaps between subsequent visits can be possibly inadequate for some VCS use cases. As a consequence, recruiting more vehicles and/or devising specialized routing/incentivization mechanisms might be necessary to achieve more comprehensive coverage of the urban road network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".