MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376271291 · doi:10.1080/00958972.2023.2210739

A family of methoxide-bridged Cu(II) compounds with N-heterocyclic ligands: dimers and chains

2023· article· en· W4376271291 on OpenAlexaff
Alma P. Araujo-Martinez, Kesli Faber, Nathan V. Huynh, Diane A. Dickie, Christopher P. Landee, Mark M. Turnbull, Brendan Twamley, Jan L. Wikaira

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Coordination Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTriclinic crystal systemMethoxideCrystallographyAntiferromagnetismCubaneCrystal structureMagnetic susceptibilityParamagnetismStereochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three new methoxide-bridged Cu(II) dimers are reported: tetrakis(2-methylpyrazine)di(μ-methoxy)diperchloratodicopper(II) (1), tetrakis(2-amino-5-iodopyridine)dibromide-di-μ-methoxydicopper(II) tetramethanol (2) and catena[(2-amino-5-methylpyridine)μ-bromido-μ-methoxycopper(II) (3). The compounds were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and variable temperature magnetic measurements. All three compounds crystallize in the triclinic space group P-1, and the dimers lie across a crystallographic inversion center. The dimers in 3 are further bridged into an alternating chain motif via semi-coordinated Cu(II)/Br interactions. All three compounds exhibit strong antiferromagnetic interactions with J/kB = −348(8) K for 1, and the exchange in 2 and 3 being too strong to estimate from the available data. The magnetic data for 1-3 are dominated by trace paramagnetic impurities at temperatures below 200 K. Correlation of the structures with the observed magnetic behavior is proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Coordination ChemistrySame topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207