A family of methoxide-bridged Cu(II) compounds with N-heterocyclic ligands: dimers and chains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three new methoxide-bridged Cu(II) dimers are reported: tetrakis(2-methylpyrazine)di(μ-methoxy)diperchloratodicopper(II) (1), tetrakis(2-amino-5-iodopyridine)dibromide-di-μ-methoxydicopper(II) tetramethanol (2) and catena[(2-amino-5-methylpyridine)μ-bromido-μ-methoxycopper(II) (3). The compounds were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and variable temperature magnetic measurements. All three compounds crystallize in the triclinic space group P-1, and the dimers lie across a crystallographic inversion center. The dimers in 3 are further bridged into an alternating chain motif via semi-coordinated Cu(II)/Br interactions. All three compounds exhibit strong antiferromagnetic interactions with J/kB = −348(8) K for 1, and the exchange in 2 and 3 being too strong to estimate from the available data. The magnetic data for 1-3 are dominated by trace paramagnetic impurities at temperatures below 200 K. Correlation of the structures with the observed magnetic behavior is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".