Le paysage religieux de la Normandie occidentale ( I er siècle avant notre ère- V e siècle de notre ère) : topographie, chronologie et diversité morphologique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Après un premier état des lieux publié en 2011 dans Bilan de la recherche archéologique en Basse-Normandie 1984-2004 121 , cet article dresse un panorama le plus complet possible du paysage religieux romain, en contexte urbain et rural, au sein des huit civitates couvrant à peu près le territoire actuel de la Normandie occidentale. Des simples temples sans galerie jusqu’aux complexes à temples multiples, en passant par le très traditionnel et très diffusé temple à plan centré ( fanum ), il s’agit de rendre compte de la diversité des morphologies, des architectures et des configurations cultuelles, sur presque six siècles. L’article aborde également la question des mobiliers présents dans les sanctuaires et des aménagements particuliers qui pourraient parfois éclairer les pratiques rituelles ou permettre d’identifier les divinités auxquelles il est rendu hommage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".