MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376278085 · doi:10.1080/14643154.2023.2206269

Deafness and Diversity

2023· article· en· W4376278085 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Levesque, Jill Duncan, Kristin Snoddon

Bibliographic record

VenueDeafness & Education International · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHearing Impairment and Communication
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)PsychologyLinguisticsSociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diversity of deafness is a theme often reported in the deaf education literature regarding a wide range of communication and language preferences, cultural and ethnic backgrounds and additional disabilities that influence the lives of deaf and hard of hearing children and young people. With an estimated 30% to 40% of deaf children diagnosed with additional disabilities and an increasing number of families raising their children in multicultural environments, the landscape of deaf education is diverse and increasingly challenging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDeafness & Education InternationalSame topicHearing Impairment and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207