Examining the relationship between gastronomic experience, revisit intention, destination image and destination brand love: a moderating role of cewebrity reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the gastronomic experience and the revisit intention using a moderated serial mediation approach. The Stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) is a theoretical lens to explore the novel relationship of experience-image-love-intention. A total of 448 responses were collected from a structured questionnaire distributed among domestic tourists on gastronomy tours. A moderated serial mediation model was performed using SmartPLS 4. The relationship between a gastronomic experience (GE) and revisit intention (RVI) was positive and significant. The mediation analysis revealed that the relationship between GE and RVI was partially mediated by destination image and destination brand love. The results of the moderated mediation indicated that cewebrity reviews moderate the relationship between gastronomic experience, destination image, and revisit intention. This research provides ways for marketers to improve gastronomic experiences through specialized gastronomic routes and itineraries to encourage tourists to revisit a destination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".