MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376278655 · doi:10.1002/mame.202300042

A Versatile Method to Create Perfusable, Capillary‐Scale Channels in Cell‐Laden Hydrogels Using Melt Electrowriting

2023· article· en· W4376278655 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emily Liu, Elizabeth Footner, Anita Quigley, Chris Baker, Peter Foley, Elena Pirogova, Robert M. I. Kapsa, Cathal O’Connell

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Materials and Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRMIT UniversityOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and ForestryAustralian National Fabrication Facility
KeywordsSelf-healing hydrogelsMaterials scienceGelatinMicrofluidicsCapillary actionBiomedical engineeringNanotechnologyComposite materialChemistryPolymer chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A major obstacle toward creating human‐scale artificial tissue models is supplying encapsulated cells with oxygen and other nutrients throughout the construct. In particular, creating channels in hydrogels that match the resolution and density of the smallest blood capillaries (≤10 µm) remains highly challenging. Here, a novel method is demonstrated where polycaprolactone fibers printed using melt‐electrowriting are encapsulated in cell‐laden hydrogels and then physically removed to produce hollow, perfusable channels. This technique produces a range of channel diameters (10–41 µm) with circular cross‐sections and in hydrogels representing various crosslinking mechanisms. The channels can be formed as interconnected grids, hierarchically branched patterns, or stacked in layers with ≈200 µm channel spacing, thus matching average capillary density in the human body. Alternatively, selective removal of fibers from a melt electrowriting grid can generate perfusable channels within a reinforcing fiber network. This method can be performed in the presence of cells, with human fibroblasts exhibiting encapsulated in gelatin methacryloyl showing no detectable cytotoxic effects. This technique is a promising approach for creating perfusable channels with very small diameters within cell‐laden hydrogel matrices, with potential applications including in vitro tissue models and hydrogel microfluidics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Materials and EngineeringSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207