MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376455162 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2023.3274656

ED-Based Spectrum Sensing for the Satellite Communication Networks Using Phased-Array Antennas

2023· article· en· W4376455162 on OpenAlexaff
Q Tian, Yuhang Wu, Feng Shen, Fuhui Zhou, Qihui Wu, Octavia A. Dobre

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceFalse alarmCommunications satelliteSatelliteSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Electronic engineeringSpectrum managementPhased arrayRemote sensingTelecommunicationsWirelessCognitive radioAntenna (radio)Artificial intelligencePhysicsEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectrum sensing is of crucial importance in the satellite communication networks to address the increasingly severe spectrum scarcity problem. However, most of the spectrum sensing schemes for detecting satellite signal use the traditional reflector antennas and have poor performance, especially under the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). To tackle this issue, an energy detection (ED)-based spectrum sensing scheme is proposed by using the phased-array antennas (PAAs) for the satellite communication networks. Moreover, the closed-form expressions for the false alarm probability and detection probability considering the visibility of satellite-to-ground links are derived. Simulation results verify our theoretical analysis and demonstrate the superiority of our proposed scheme compared with the schemes that do not consider the spatial condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207