Logistics in the Sky: A Two-Phase Optimization Approach for the Drone Package Pickup and Delivery System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The application of drones in last-mile distribution has been a contentious research topic in recent years. Existing urban distribution modes mostly depend on trucks. This paper proposes a novel package pickup and delivery mode and system wherein multiple drones collaborate with automatic devices. The proposed mode uses free areas on top of residential buildings to set automatic devices as delivery and pickup points of packages, and employs drones to transport packages between buildings and depots. The integrated scheduling problem of package drop-pickup considering${m}$-drones,${m}$-depots, and${m}$-customers is crucial for the system. Therefore, we propose a simulated-annealing-based two-phase optimization (SATO) approach to solve this problem. In the first phase, tasks are allocated to depots for serving, such that the initial problem is decomposed into multiple single-depot scheduling problems with${m}$-drone. In the second phase, considering the drone capability and task demand constraints, we generated a route-planning scheme for drones in each depot. Concurrently, an improved variable neighborhood descent (IVND) algorithm was designed in the first phase to reallocate tasks, and a local search (LS) algorithm was proposed to search for high-quality solutions in the second phase. Finally, extensive experiments and comparative studies were conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".