MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376456789 · doi:10.1109/twc.2023.3273197

Multi-User Downlink Beamforming Using Uplink Downlink Duality With CEQs for Frequency Selective Channels

2023· article· en· W4376456789 on OpenAlexafffund
Khurram Usman Mazher, Amine Mezghani, Robert W. Heath

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQualcommNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTelecommunications linkBeamformingComputer scienceComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-resolution fully digital transceivers are infeasible at millimeter-wave (mmWave) due to their increased power consumption, cost, and hardware complexity. The use of low-resolution converters is one possible solution to realize fully digital architectures at mmWave. In this paper, we consider a setting in which a fully digital base station with constant envelope quantized (CEQ) digital-to-analog converters on each radio frequency chain communicates with multiple single antenna users with individual signal-to-quantization-plus-interference-plus-noise ratio (SQINR) constraints over frequency selective channels. We first establish uplink downlink duality for the system with CEQ hardware constraints and OFDM-based transmission considered in this paper. Based on the uplink downlink duality principle, we present a solution to the multi-user multi-carrier beamforming and power allocation problem that maximizes the minimum SQINR over all users and sub-carriers. We then present a per sub-carrier version of the originally proposed solution that decouples all sub-carriers of the OFDM waveform resulting in smaller sub-problems that can be solved in a parallel manner. Our numerical results based on 3GPP channel models generated from Quadriga demonstrate improvements in terms of ergodic sum rate and ergodic minimum rate over state-of-the-art linear solutions. We also show improved performance over non-linear solutions in terms of the coded bit error rate with the increased flexibility of assigning individual user SQINRs built into the proposed framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207