MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376461046 · doi:10.1525/phr.2023.92.2.316

Review: <i>Line of Blood and Dirt: Creating the Canada-United States Border across Indigenous Lands</i>, by Benjamin Hoy

2023· article· en· W4376461046 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Historical Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousIconDirtHistoryNative American studiesCitationArt historyGeographyPolitical scienceSociologyCartographyAnthropologyEcologyLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| May 01 2023 Review: Line of Blood and Dirt: Creating the Canada-United States Border across Indigenous Lands, by Benjamin Hoy Line of Blood and Dirt: Creating the Canada-United States Border across Indigenous Lands. By Benjamin Hoy. (New York, Oxford University Press, 2021. 344 pp.) David-Paul B. Hedberg David-Paul B. Hedberg Outdoor History Consulting Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Pacific Historical Review (2023) 92 (2): 316–317. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2023.92.2.316 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation David-Paul B. Hedberg; Review: Line of Blood and Dirt: Creating the Canada-United States Border across Indigenous Lands, by Benjamin Hoy. Pacific Historical Review 1 May 2023; 92 (2): 316–317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2023.92.2.316 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentPacific Historical Review Search I’ll look at Peace Arch Park at the Canada-U.S. border differently the next time I pass by to see my family living on the other side. Benjamin Hoy’s Line of Blood and Dirt: Creating the Canada–United States Border Across Indigenous Lands is both an important contribution to the scholarship of borderlands and more broadly to Canadian and U.S. history. Readers of Hoy’s book will come to see the border as a colonial tool for the mass starvation of indigenous people; as a calculated line that attempted to reorder kinship relations and definitions of nationality and indigeneity; as an ambiguous zone of control where goods and people moved through colonial power structures and inability to regulate or fathom the Indigenous world that existed before the border. Hoy argues the Canada-U.S. border developed differently from the U.S.- Mexico border “because of American perceptions of cultural similarity and military prowess” (p. 6). The... You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it