MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376470781 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2023.060209

Neural network and system for attitude and behavior detection based on pressure data

2023· article· en· W4376470781 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianzhong Qiu, Caiwei Liu, Jun Wu, Bingyan Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI and Big Data Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSichuan Province Science and Technology Support ProgramDepartment of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province
KeywordsWearable computerComputer scienceProcess (computing)Convolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceTrajectoryArtificial neural networkReal-time computingPoint (geometry)Wearable technologyComputer visionChange detectionEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the process of monitoring the behavior of the elderly, wearable devices and visual devices are easily limited by the site and environment, resulting in poor monitoring results. This paper proposes a posture behavior detection method and system based on pressure data. The convolutional neural network algorithm is used to identify the pressure data to detect the posture, calculate the posture holding time and posture change frequency, judge the posture change action process according to the trajectory of the pressure center point, and finally record and analyze the user's behavior. The correct rate of pose classification of the model used in this paper has reached 98.69%, and the correct rate of pose retention time has reached 98.06%. Finally completed the research and development of the relevant monitoring system, which can be used in the field of medical treatment and daily care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicAI and Big Data ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207