Spatially Dispersive Metasurfaces—Part III: Zero-Thickness Modeling of Periodic and Finite Nonuniform Surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A zero-thickness model of nonuniform spatially dispersive (SD) metasurfaces is developed and demonstrated numerically for practical structures. This is an extension of Nizer Rahmeier et al. (2022) and Smy et al. (2022), which proposed a method of modeling uniform SD metasurfaces by expressing their surface susceptibilities as rational polynomial functions in the spatial frequency domain. This led to the extended generalized sheet transition conditions (GSTCs) forming a set of differential equations relating the spatial derivatives of both difference and average fields around the surface that were then integrated into an integral equation (IE) solver. Here, the extended GSTCs are further developed to model nonuniform metasurfaces by approximating them as locally linear space-invariant (LSI). Using this model, a semianalytical Floquet method is derived to predict scattered fields from periodically varying metasurfaces. The extended GSTCs, Floquet method, and IE method are tested on several nonuniform surfaces consisting of short metal dipole cells of varying lengths exhibiting strong spatial dispersion. The physical surfaces are simulated in Ansys FEM-HFSS, while their zero-thickness equivalents, both dispersive and nondispersive, are simulated using the Floquet and IE methods. Excellent agreement is shown between the Floquet-SD and IE-GSTC-SD methods and HFSS, demonstrating the importance of spatial dispersion to model their scattered fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".