MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376486309 · doi:10.36308/jik.v13i2.402

HUBUNGAN IBU BERSALIN TERKONFIRMASI COVID -19 DENGAN JENIS PERSALINAN DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS SLAWI

2022· article· id· W4376486309 on OpenAlexaff
Ika Esti Anggraeni, Tri Agustina Hadiningsih, Rina Febri

Bibliographic record

VenueBhamada Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan (E-Journal) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Derajat kesehatan masyarakat Indonesia terlihat dari Angka Kematian Ibu dan Angka Kematian Bayi. AKI dan AKB tersebut digunakan sebagai indicator pelayanan kesehatan Ibu dan Bayi. Prevalensi AKI di Kabupaten Tegal Tahun 2021 sebesar 30 orang. Penyebab AKI tersebut dikarenakan Covid-19 (40%), Pre Eklampsia Berat (30%), Perdarahan (20%), lain-lain (10%) (Dinkes Kabupaten Tegal, 2021). Berdasarkan data di Puskesmas Slawi Tahun 2021 terdapat 350 ibu yang melahirkan di Puskesmas Slawi. Dari 350 ibu bersalin terdapat 2.6% ibu bersalin yang terkonfirmasi COVID-19. Dilihat dari jenis persalinan, 40% jenis persalinan dilakukan dengan tindakan (rujuk) dan 60% dengan persalinan spontan.Metode penelitian adalah korelasi dengan pendekatan cross sectional. Dilaksanakan di Puskesmas Slawi pada bulan Januari – Mei 2022, sampel yang digunakan adalah 130 ibu bersalin yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dan kriteria eksklusi, menggunakan data sekunder dengan uji statistik Chi-square. Hasil: berdasarkan uji statistik didapatkan nilai p sebesar 0.266 sehingga dapat disimpulkan Tidak Terdapat Hubungan Ibu Bersalin Terkonfirmasi COVID-19 dengan Jenis Persalinan di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Slawi Kabupaten Tegal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBhamada Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan (E-Journal)Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207