MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376492691 · doi:10.1093/whq/whad064

Homewaters: A Human and Natural History of Puget Sound. By David B. Williams

2023· article· en· W4376492691 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nancy J. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Historical Quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSound (geography)Natural historyIndex (typography)HistoryNatural (archaeology)Art historyEnvironmental ethicsArchaeologyPhilosophyOceanographyEcologyBiologyComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Homewaters” is a perfect title for this captivating book about Puget Sound, since its waters and surrounding landscapes have been the ideal home for so many–both humans and countless other species–over the years. David Williams has a clear, friendly style of writing, making the book an easy read for people of diverse backgrounds and experiences. He weaves together the history, geography, hydrology, ecology and anthropology of this unique waterbody, telling its story from ancient times to the present in a very personal and reflective way. The chapters build upon each other, each enriching our understanding of this special region and helping us to develop the relationships with the Sound that are essential for its future integrity. Williams takes us back to the chilly Pleistocene times and describes the profound changes that have taken place in the region over the millennia: the influence of volcanoes, sea level fluctuations, the way the Sound’s topography directs the currents and the mixing of fresh and salt water, and of course, the arrival of people and how their lives have changed over time. Citing contemporary Native Americans from the many nations whose territories surround the Sound, as well as archaeologists and historians, he explains how the First Peoples learned to survive and thrive in this beautiful place, their alliances with other communities through trade and intermarriage, and how they have endured and countered enemy attacks. He also explores the unique and effective ways Indigenous Peoples have developed for sustaining and enhancing the various resources of the region over countless generations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern Historical QuarterlySame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207