A REVIEW ON ETHNOMEDICINAL USES, PHYTOCHEMISTRY AND PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF COCCULUS HIRSUTUS (L.) DIELS AND COCCULUS PENDULUS (FORST) DIELS
Classification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Menispermaceae is an important angiosperm family containing several medicinally important plants including Cocculus. This review presents a comparative report of two species of this genus, namely, Cocculus hirsutus (L.) Diels and Cocculus pendulus(J. R. Forst. & G. Forst.) Diels. While both species are immensely used by the tribal folk in various forms, they are also abundantly utilised in western medicine. Phytochemical analysis of both species report the presence of several important phytochemicals like alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, phenols, sterols, etc. The pharmacological studies of C. hirsutus(L.) and C. pendulus (Forst)report that the plants contain many properties such antibacterial, anticancer, antiviral, wound-healing, diuretic, analgesic, among others that are quite beneficial to human health. Though much analysis and research work has been reported for Cocculus hirsutus(L.), there are yet many studies to be done on the aspects of Cocculus pendulus (Forst).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it