Accessing the Health Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer in Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adolescents and young adult cancer patients have unique characteristics and specific needs that, when properly comprehended, can improve quality of life during and after the oncologic treatment.Objective: verify those that would be the main health needs among this group of patients.Method: cultural and linguistic validation of a canadian questionnaire regarding the theme, with posterior application on 252 patients afflicted by malign neoplasms, with ages 15-39 undergoing oncological treatment or having finished their treatment in the last 5 years.Results: we have verified differences and similarities when comparing the results from Brazil and Canada.Some needs had the same level of importance, such as preoccupations with healthy diets, while other presented disparities that reflect cultural differences between the two groups. Conclusion:based on the gathered results, we indicated what would be the specific needs of this demographic, guiding adequations to physical space, interdisciplinary follow-ups and the supplying of information relevant to the target groups in question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".