Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2010), "Research in the Sociology of Organizations", Lounsbury, M. and Hirsch, P.M. (Ed.) Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis: Part B (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 30 Part B), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. iii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)000030B020 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2010, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Research in the Sociology of Organizations Research in the Sociology of Organizations Copyright page List of contributors Advisory board Acknowledgments Markets on trial: toward a policy-oriented economic sociology The misapplication of Mr. Michael Jensen: how agency theory brought down the economy and why it might again Neoliberalism in crisis: Regulatory roots of the U.S. financial meltdown The American corporate elite and the historical roots of the financial crisis of 2008 The political economy of financial exuberance The institutional embeddedness of market failure: Why speculative bubbles still occur The social construction of causality: The effects of institutional myths on financial regulation Mesoeconomics: Business cycles, entrepreneurship, and economic crisis in commercial building markets Through the looking glass: Inefficient deregulation in the United States and efficient state ownership in China Precedence for the unprecedented: A comparative institutionalist view of the financial crisis After the Ownership Society: another world is possible What if we had been in charge? The sociologist as builder of rational institutions The future of economics, new circuits for capital, and re-envisioning the relation of state and market
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".