MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4376601111

Potential Link Between Several Learner Characteristics and Second Quarter Achievement in Science (Physics) of Grade VIII Students

2018· article· W4376601111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Omar G. Lamina

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2018
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Mathematics educationLink (geometry)PhysicsEngineering physicsPsychologyComputer scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary objective of this study is to the determine and analyze the potential link between several learner characteristics (brain dominance, selfesteem and study skills) and their achievement for the second quarter in Grade VIII Science of selected students of Casimiro A. Ynares Sr. Memorial National High School.This study employed three adapted research tools in a questionnaire check list form as main tool in gathering the needed data.One hundred students served as respondents of the study.Results showed that there is no significant difference among the achievement of learners with varied brain dominance and that the achievement of the students does not favour in any particular learner groups based on brain dominance.Furthermore, there is also no significant difference among the achievement of learners with varied self-esteem this implies that that a high, low or moderate self-esteem does not affect the learner's achievement in Science.On the other hand, there is significant difference among the achievement of learners with varied study skills.This suggests that a strong study habit or skills have a great effect on the learners' achievement in Science for the second quarter.The results also revealed a low and no significant correlation exist between self-esteem and achievement, the relationship is not significant because of the low achievement of learners reflected through the second quarter grade with varied self-esteem.On the other hand, there is a high significant correlation that exist between study skills and the achievement of learners.The results imply the importance of a study habit or skills to be able to achieve a high academic achievement in Science.Lastly, a moderate significant correlation exists between self-esteem and study skills as also revealed on the table.In the light of the findings it is recommended that teachers should understand and know their students deeply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)→Same topicEducation and Critical Thinking Development→French-language works237,207→