Social Fields: Knowing the Water We Swim in
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the term ‘social field’ has surfaced sporadically in various disciplines throughout the twentieth Century, it has largely lain dormant as a conceptual framework. In this article, we re-introduce the social field as a foundational concept both for understanding collective lived experience and for developing methodologies to effect systems change. We explore and expand on three inter-related properties that we consider to be phenomena common to all social fields: intercorporeality, autonomy, and affordance. Drawing on recent and emerging intervention methodologies focusing on these properties, we illustrate the potential of taking a social field perspective for both diagnosis and intervention in the change process. We make the case that the social field is a distinct entity and a powerful leverage point for effecting systems change, and that the re-invigoration of social field theory and practice can make a significant contribution to the field of organizational and systems change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it