Une instance participative en discussion : le Conseil national des personnes accueillies (CNPA) et les Conseils régionaux des personnes accueillies (CRPA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les Conseils des personnes accueillies/accompagnées ou l’ayant été ( cnpa et crpa ) sont issus d’une commande publique qui date d’un peu plus de dix ans : organiser la participation des personnes en situation de précarité aux politiques qui les concernent et plus particulièrement aux politiques d’hébergement et d’accès au logement. Fruit du travail de cette instance participative, un plaidoyer intitulé Paroles sans filtres – Constats et préconisations des personnes en situation de précarité sur les politiques qui les concernent est paru en 2022. Un délégué régional, une ancienne déléguée actuellement membre active du cnpa et deux professionnelles, tous quatre impliqués dans ce travail reviennent ici avec une enseignante-chercheuse sur l’histoire, les missions de ce réseau ainsi que sur les aspirations dont le plaidoyer se fait l’écho.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".