MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376616881 · doi:10.3917/savo.061.0161

Bilan et prospectives – Pratiques et recherches en éducation des adultes 2000-2020 au Québec

2023· article· fr· W4376616881 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean‐François Roussel

Bibliographic record

VenueSavoirs · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis la Révolution tranquille, l’apport de l’éducation des adultes au Québec a évolué en passant d’une voie dite de seconde chance, vers celle de moteur d’une société en transformation. De nos jours, elle est surtout orientée vers le monde du travail. Au Québec, l’éducation des adultes a permis de développer trois domaines de recherche principaux, soit ceux de la littératie, de la formation au travail et du rôle des formateurs. Ce bilan établit également qu’entre 2000 et 2020 le nombre de recherches doctorales publiées liées à l’éducation des adultes s’est accru, la plupart ayant été menées en milieu organisationnel. Aujourd’hui, l’éducation des adultes au Québec vit une transition majeure en raison de l’apprentissage au moyen des technologies. Dans ce contexte, le développement des compétences en littératie numérique est devenu un enjeu majeur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.337
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSavoirsSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207