Bilan et prospectives – Pratiques et recherches en éducation des adultes 2000-2020 au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis la Révolution tranquille, l’apport de l’éducation des adultes au Québec a évolué en passant d’une voie dite de seconde chance, vers celle de moteur d’une société en transformation. De nos jours, elle est surtout orientée vers le monde du travail. Au Québec, l’éducation des adultes a permis de développer trois domaines de recherche principaux, soit ceux de la littératie, de la formation au travail et du rôle des formateurs. Ce bilan établit également qu’entre 2000 et 2020 le nombre de recherches doctorales publiées liées à l’éducation des adultes s’est accru, la plupart ayant été menées en milieu organisationnel. Aujourd’hui, l’éducation des adultes au Québec vit une transition majeure en raison de l’apprentissage au moyen des technologies. Dans ce contexte, le développement des compétences en littératie numérique est devenu un enjeu majeur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".