EEG functional connectivity in infants at elevated familial risk for autism spectrum disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Many studies have reported that autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is associated with atypical structural and functional connectivity. However, relatively little is known about the development of these differences in infancy and on how trajectories may vary between sexes. Methods: We used the International Infant EEG Platform (EEG-IP), a high-density electroencephalogram (EEG) dataset pooled from two independent infant sibling cohorts, to characterize such neurodevelopmental deviations during the first years of life. EEG was recorded at 6, 12, and 18 months of age at typical (N=97) or high familial risk for ASD (N=98), determined by the presence of an older sibling with a confirmed ASD diagnosis. We computed the functional connectivity between cortical EEG sources during video watching using the corrected imaginary part of phase-locking values. Results: Our findings showed low regional specificity for group differences in functional connectivity but revealed different sex-specific trajectories between females and males in the group of high-risk infants. Specifically, functional connectivity was negatively correlated with ADOS calibrated severity scores, particularly at 12 months for the social affect score for females and for the restrictive and repetitive behaviors for males. Limitations: This study has been limited mostly due to issues related to the relatively small effective sample size inherent in sibling studies, particularly for diagnostic group comparisons. Conclusions: These results are consistent with sex differences in ASD observed in previous research and provide further insights into the role of functional connectivity in these differences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".