CT airway remodelling and chronic cough
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Structural airway changes related to chronic cough (CC) are described in the literature, but so far reported data are rare and non-conclusive. Furthermore, they derive mainly from cohorts with small sample sizes. Advanced CT imaging not only allows airway abnormalities to be quantified, but also to count the number of visible airways. The current study evaluates these airway abnormalities in CC and assesses the contribution of CC in addition to CT findings on the progression of airflow limitation, defined as a decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) over time. METHODS: A total of 1183 males and females aged ≥40 years with thoracic CT scans and valid spirometry from Canadian Obstructive Lung Disease, a Canadian multicentre, population-based study has been included in this analysis. Participants were stratified into 286 never-smokers, 297 ever-smokers with normal lung function and 600 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) of different severity grades. Imaging parameters analyses included total airway count (TAC), airway wall thickness, emphysema as well as parameters for functional small airway disease quantification. RESULTS: Irrespective of COPD presence, CC was not related to specific airway and lung structure features. Independent of TAC and emphysema score, CC was highly associated with FEV1 decline over time in the entire study population, particularly in ever-smokers (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The absence of specific structural CT features independently from COPD presence indicate that other underlying mechanisms are contributing to the symptomatology of CC. On top of derived CT parameters, CC seems to be independently associated with FEV1 decline. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00920348.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".