Independent origins and evolution of the secondary replicons of the class Gammaproteobacteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multipartite genomes, consisting of more than one replicon, have been found in approximately 10 % of bacteria, many of which belong to the phylum Proteobacteria. Many aspects of their origin and evolution, and the possible advantages related to this type of genome structure, remain to be elucidated. Here, we performed a systematic analysis of the presence and distribution of multipartite genomes in the class Gammaproteobacteria, which includes several genera with diverse lifestyles. Within this class, multipartite genomes are mainly found in the order Alteromonadales (mostly in the genus Pseudoalteromonas ) and in the family Vibrionaceae . Our data suggest that the emergence of secondary replicons in Gammaproteobacteria is rare and that they derive from plasmids. Despite their multiple origins, we highlighted the presence of evolutionary trends such as the inverse proportionality of the genome to chromosome size ratio, which appears to be a general feature of bacteria with multipartite genomes irrespective of taxonomic group. We also highlighted some functional trends. The core gene set of the secondary replicons is extremely small, probably limited to essential genes or genes that favour their maintenance in the genome, while the other genes are less conserved. This hypothesis agrees with the idea that the primary advantage of secondary replicons could be to facilitate gene acquisition through horizontal gene transfer, resulting in replicons enriched in genes associated with adaptation to different ecological niches. Indeed, secondary replicons are enriched both in genes that could promote adaptation to harsh environments, such as those involved in antibiotic, biocide and metal resistance, and in functional categories related to the exploitation of environmental resources (e.g. carbohydrates), which can complement chromosomal functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".