MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376641717 · doi:10.46747/cfp.6905e98

Les médecins de famille comme défenseurs de la fluoration de l’eau potable

2023· article· fr· W4376641717 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
James A. Dickinson, Juliet Guichon, Wendy Wadey, Keith Da Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Family Physician · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Health and Care Utilization
Canadian institutionsCanadian Physiotherapy AssociationMusée de la CivilisationUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPotable waterMedicineArtEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La fluoration de l’eau potable (FEP) est un moyen sécuritaire, efficace et abordable de réduire la carie dentaire (aussi appelée cavité dentaire ) chez les adultes et les enfants, et pourtant, seulement 39,8 % des Canadiens sont actuellement approvisionnés en eau potable fluorée, soit une

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Family PhysicianSame topicDental Health and Care UtilizationFrench-language works237,207