MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376642824 · doi:10.1002/jmri.28783

Assessment of Myocardial Viability and Risk Stratification in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Qualitative and Quantitative Stress Cardiac <scp>MRI</scp> Study

2023· article· en· W4376642824 on OpenAlexaff
Mengchun Jiang, Yueqin Chen, Yang Su, Hu Guo, Xiaoyue Zhou, Meichen Luo, Mu Zeng, Xinqun Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsCircle Cardiovascular Imaging
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineCollateral circulationCardiologyPerfusionInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseAngiographyOcclusionCoronary occlusionNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Indicators for assessing myocardial viability and risk stratification in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) are still in the research stage. PURPOSE: To use stress-MRI to assess myocardial function, blood perfusion, and viability and to explore their relationship with collateral circulation. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Fifty-one patients with CTO in at least one major artery confirmed by X-ray coronary angiography (male: 46; age 55.2 ± 10.8 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T; TurboFlash, balanced steady-state free precession cine, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequences. ASSESSMENT: Stress-MRI was used to obtain qualitative and quantitative parameters of segmental myocardium. Myocardial segments supplied by CTO target vessels were grouped according to the degree of collateral circulation assessed by radiographic coronary angiography (no/mild, moderate, or good). Depending on qualitative stress perfusion assessment and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) extent, segments were also categorized as negative, viable, or trans-infarcted. STATISTICAL TESTS: Independent sample Student's t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman correlation coefficient (r). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 334 segments were supplied by CTO target vessels. The radial strain (RS), circumferential strain (CS), longitudinal strain (LS) of the negative, viable, and trans-infarcted regions showed a significant and stepwise impairment. Myocardial blood flow at rest was positively correlated with RS, CS, and LS (r = 0.42, 0.43, 0.38, respectively). Among the different collateral circulation, there were no significant differences in RS, CS, LS, and LGE volume (P = 0.788, 0.562, 0.122, 0.170, respectively), and there were also no statistically significant differences in the proportions of negative, viable, and trans-infarcted regions (P = 0.372). DATA CONCLUSION: Myocardial perfusion obtained by stress-MRI combined with strain and LGE may comprehensively evaluate myocardial function and viability, and has potential to facilitate risk stratification of CTO. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207