Multi-omic modeling of antidepressant response implicates dynamic immune and inflammatory changes in individuals who respond to treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and is commonly treated with antidepressant drugs (AD). Although effective, many patients fail to respond to AD treatment, and accordingly identifying factors that can predict AD response would greatly improve treatment outcomes. In this study, we developed a machine learning tool to integrate multi-omic datasets (gene expression, DNA methylation, and genotyping) to identify biomarker profiles associated with AD response in a cohort of individuals with MDD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals with MDD (N = 111) were treated for 8 weeks with antidepressants and were separated into responders and non-responders based on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Using peripheral blood samples, we performed RNA-sequencing, assessed DNA methylation using the Illumina EPIC array, and performed genotyping using the Illumina PsychArray. To address this rich multi-omic dataset with high dimensional features, we developed integrative Geneset-Embedded non-negative Matrix factorization (iGEM), a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) based model, supplemented with auxiliary information regarding gene sets and gene-methylation relationships. In particular, we factorize the subjects by features (i.e., gene expression or DNA methylation) into subjects-by-factors and factors-by-features. We define the factors as the meta-phenotypes as they represent integrated composite scores of the molecular measurements for each subject. RESULTS: Using our model, we identified a number of meta-phenotypes which were related to AD response. By integrating geneset information into the model, we were able to relate these meta-phenotypes to biological processes, including a meta-phenotype related to immune and inflammatory functions as well as other genes related to depression or AD response. The meta-phenotype identified several genes including immune interleukin 1 receptor like 1 (IL1RL1) and interleukin 5 receptor (IL5) subunit alpha (IL5RA), AKT/PIK3 pathway related phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 6 (PIK3R6), and sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 3 (SMPD3), which has been identified as a target of AD treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The derived meta-phenotypes and associated biological functions represent both biomarkers to predict response, as well as potential new treatment targets. Our method is applicable to other diseases with multi-omic data, and the software is open source and available on Github (https://github.com/li-lab-mcgill/iGEM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".