3D Model of Managing the Sustainable Development Process of a Territorial Community
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main purpose of the article is to present a model for managing the process of sustainable development of a territorial society.Based on the analysis of existing approaches and technologies for managing the sustainable development of territorial communities in the practice of public administration in Ukraine, the article proposes a novel model which is grounded on a complex interpretation of the continuums of the economic, social, and environmental conditions of these criteria in the Cartesian coordinates and allows making management decisions regarding plans, programs, and projects for community development which result from the comparative analysis and assessment of the set goals, tasks and expected outcomes, taking into account their compliance/non-compliance with all three criteria at the same time.The research methodology involves the use of the modeling method.The information-gene model of sustainable development of regional social systems is used.Of the novelty, it should be noted the rethinking of the essence of modeling.The graphic-analytical method allows you to systematically establish quantitative and qualitative relationships between the individual elements of the object of study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it