MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376869168 · doi:10.18280/acsm.470201

Valorization of Cement Kiln Dust (CKD) from the Ain-Al-Kebira Cement Plant (Algeria) in Building Materials

2023· article· en· W4376869168 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amar Guettouche, Abdelghani Merdas, Fouad Berrabah, Lyazid Guechi

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCementCement kilnKilnEnvironmental scienceWaste managementMetallurgyMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid waste management is one of the world's major environmental concerns.Cement Kiln Dust (CKD) is a by-product of cement manufacturing.It is a fine-grained, solid and highly alkaline particulate material.Environmental concerns related to Portland cement production, CO2 emissions and CKD disposal are becoming increasingly important.Replacing some of the cement with CKDs will significantly reduce the amount of clinker to be produced, which will then reduce CO2 emissions into the atmosphere and transform the CKDs into useful products while allowing sustainable concrete/mortar to be produced in an environmentally friendly way.This work is part of the recovery of machining waste from the manufacture of cements produced from a local Algerian cement plant, in particular CKD.Study of the use of CKD influence in mortar and concrete reveals that the percentage increase in CKD accelerates setting time.From the obtained results (simple compression and bending tension) we can conclude that the use of CKD in mortar can be favorable for substitution and/or addition up to 10%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207