PHASTEST: faster than PHASTER, better than PHAST
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PHASTEST (PHAge Search Tool with Enhanced Sequence Translation) is the successor to the PHAST and PHASTER prophage finding web servers. PHASTEST is designed to support the rapid identification, annotation and visualization of prophage sequences within bacterial genomes and plasmids. PHASTEST also supports rapid annotation and interactive visualization of all other genes (protein coding regions, tRNA/tmRNA/rRNA sequences) in bacterial genomes. Given that bacterial genome sequencing has become so routine, the need for fast tools to comprehensively annotate bacterial genomes has become progressively more important. PHASTEST not only offers faster and more accurate prophage annotations than its predecessors, it also provides more complete whole genome annotations and much improved genome visualization capabilities. In standardized tests, we found that PHASTEST is 31% faster and 2-3% more accurate in prophage identification than PHASTER. Specifically, PHASTEST can process a typical bacterial genome in 3.2 min (raw sequence) or in 1.3 min when given a pre-annotated GenBank file. Improvements in PHASTEST's ability to annotate bacterial genomes now make it a particularly powerful tool for whole genome annotation. In addition, PHASTEST now offers a much more modern and responsive visualization interface that allows users to generate, edit, annotate and interactively visualize (via zooming, rotating, dragging, panning, resetting), colourful, publication quality genome maps. PHASTEST continues to offer popular options such as an API for programmatic queries, a Docker image for local installations, support for multiple (metagenomic) queries and the ability to perform automated look-ups against thousands of previously PHAST-annotated bacterial genomes. PHASTEST is available online at https://phastest.ca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.049 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".