A comparison of phenotypic and WGS drug susceptibility testing in <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> isolates from the Republic of Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: WGS has significant potential to help tackle the major public health problem of TB. The Republic of Korea has the third highest rates of TB of all Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries but there has been very limited use of WGS in TB to date. Objectives: (MTB) clinical isolates from 2015 to 2017 from two centres in the Republic of Korea using WGS to compare phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and WGS drug susceptibility predictions (WGS-DSP). Methods: Fifty-seven MTB isolates had DNA extracted and were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform. The WGS analysis was performed using bwa mem, bcftools and IQ-Tree; resistance markers were identified using TB profiler. Phenotypic susceptibilities were carried out at the Supranational TB reference laboratory (Korean Institute of Tuberculosis). Results: For first-line antituberculous drugs concordance for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol was 98.25%, 92.98%, 87.72% and 85.96%, respectively. The sensitivity of WGS-DSP compared with pDST for rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol was 97.30%, 92.11%, 78.95% and 95.65%, respectively. The specificity for these first-line antituberculous drugs was 100%, 94.74%, 92.11% and 79.41%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for second-line drugs ranged from 66.67% to 100%, and from 82.98% to 100%, respectively. Conclusions: This study confirms the potential role for WGS in drug susceptibility prediction, which would reduce turnaround times. However, further larger studies are needed to ensure current databases of drug resistance mutations are reflective of the TB present in the Republic of Korea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".