MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TGA Study of the Reaction Kinetics of a CuFeMnAlO<sub>4+δ</sub> Oxygen Carrier for Methane Chemical Looping Combustion under High Pressure and Atmospheric Pressure Conditions

2023· article· en· W4376873382 on OpenAlexafffund
Yewen Tan, Jarrett Riley, Dennis Lu, Ranjani Siriwardane, Robin W. Hughes

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersOffice of Energy Research and Development
KeywordsOxygenChemical looping combustionThermogravimetric analysisChemistryMethanePartial pressureAtmospheric pressureCombustionLimiting oxygen concentrationActivation energyChemical kineticsReaction rateOrder of reactionRedoxAnalytical Chemistry (journal)KineticsInorganic chemistryReaction rate constantPhysical chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Reduction and oxidation kinetics of a CuFeMnAlO 4+δ oxygen carrier for methane were studied using an atmospheric thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) and a pressurized TGA. Important parameters such as temperature (500–900 °C), particle size distribution (150–650 μm), and partial pressures of reactants (methane and oxygen) were evaluated. Results showed that the reduction of the oxygen carrier was not affected by particle size distribution studied in this work, and that above 750 °C, the effect of the temperature on oxygen carrier reduction started to diminish. The reaction time approaches an asymptotic limit as methane partial pressure increases. For oxygen carrier oxidation, it was found that the rate of oxidation increased with increasing oxygen concentration. The effect of the oxygen concentration was more noticeable when the oxygen concentration was below 7.5%. Because of the inherent feature of the oxygen carrier, its chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling property was also assessed. A phase boundary-controlled shrinking sphere model was used to model the test data from the TGAs. Modeling results showed that the oxygen carrier reduction had a reaction order of 1 with an activation energy of ∼46 kJ/mol. Oxygen carrier oxidation demonstrated a reaction order of 1.1 with an activation energy of ∼55 kJ/mol. Additionally, the differences of the experimental results between the atmospheric pressure TGA and the pressurized TGA were discussed in detail and the limitations of the pressurized TGA were highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207