MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4376874065 · doi:10.1145/3583085

Catalytic Branching Programs from Groups and General Protocols

2023· article· en· W4376874065 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Computation Theory · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBranching (polymer chemistry)Amortized analysisBoolean functionExponential functionMathematicsMultiplicity (mathematics)Binary decision diagramCombinatoricsRange (aeronautics)Discrete mathematicsData structureComputer scienceAlgorithmGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CCCatalytic branching programs (catalytic bps) compute the same n -bit Boolean function f at multiple entry points that need to be remembered at the exit nodes of the branching program (bp). When a doubly exponential number of entry points is allowed, linear amortized catalytic bp size is known to be achievable for any f . Here a method is introduced that produces a catalytic bp out of a reversible bp and a deterministic dag-like communication protocol. In a multiplicity range as low as linear, approximating a threshold is shown possible at linear amortized cost. In the same low range, computing Maj and Mod are shown possible at a cost that beats the brute force repetition of the best known bp for these functions by a polylog factor. In the exponential range, the method yields O ( n log n ) amortized cost for any symmetric function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it