Contractile function of fasting and digesting broad-snouted caiman (<i>Caiman latirostris</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Feeding regimes are a critical process to ensure survival and reproduction, which modulate several behavioral and physiological patterns of ectotherms, especially cardiovascular adjustments. However, crocodilian myocardial contractile function after food intake remains understudied. We investigated the importance of ventricular myocardial contractility during digestion in the broad-snouted caiman, Caiman latirostris Daudin, 1801. Isometric ventricle preparations and Ca2+-handling protein expression were used to investigate the effects of prolonged fasting (30 days) and feeding (48 h after feeding on meals at 15% of body mass) on cardiac function. Upon feeding, there was no significant difference in relative ventricular mass. The cardiac response of the caiman to digestion was characterized by upregulation of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger expression and an increase in myocardial contractility (positive inotropism and lusitropism) within the physiological range of heart rate. The digesting caiman's ventricular myocardium was able to maintain faster kinetics of contraction and relaxation, allowing for significantly increased cardiac pumping capacity at higher pacing frequencies. Our results demonstrated that the myocardium of broad-snouted caimans exhibits specializations in excitation–contraction coupling, which can provide a means to support high cardiovascular performance during digestion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".