Existence and stability of bifurcating solution of a chemotaxis model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on a chemotaxis model with no-flux boundary conditions. We first discuss the stability of the unique positive equilibrium by treating the chemotaxis coefficient <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="xi"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> ξ </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\xi</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> as the Hopf bifurcation and the steady state bifurcation parameter. Hereafter, we perform the existence and stability of the bifurcating solution, which bifurcated from the steady state bifurcation, by using the Crandall-Rabinowitz local bifurcation theory. It is noticed that few existing literatures give a discriminant to determine the stability of the bifurcating solution for the chemotaxis models. To this end, we will fill this gap, and an explicit formula will be presented. This technique can also be applied in other ecological models with chemotaxis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".