Improving the chronostratigraphic framework of the Transvaal Supergroup (South Africa) through in-situ and high-precision U-Pb geochronology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Transvaal Supergroup, on the Kaapvaal Craton in South Africa, is widely accepted as one of the best-preserved sedimentary archives to constrain planetary-scale environmental changes during the late Archean and early Proterozoic, yet the sedimentation age for certain stratigraphic intervals remains poorly constrained. To improve the temporal control on some of the first-order global changes recorded in these rocks, we carried out U-Pb analyses of detrital zircon populations from several clastic and volcano-clastic sedimentary units of the Transvaal Supergroup. We applied the Chemical Abrasion-Isotope Dilution-Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS) technique on detrital and volcanic zircon populations that had been previously screened using the Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) technique. We report new maximum depositional age estimates for the Pannetjie (2456.6 ± 7.0 Ma), the Heynskop (2451.5 ± 2.5 Ma), the Makganyene (2423.1 ± 1.0 Ma) and the Hekpoort formations (2248.0 ± 1.1 Ma). A ca. 2.25 Ga-old cluster of LA-ICP-MS analyses in the Makganyene Formation was identified to be spurious, since it was completely removed during the chemical abrasion. Thus, we speculate that circulation of hydrothermal fluids and associated Pb-loss from a radiation-damaged lattice during the emplacement of the much younger Hekpoort Formation or possibly the Ophthalmia Orogeny, recorded in Western Australia, may have reset the U-Pb system of this zircon population. This implies that the accurate maximum depositional age of the Makganyene Formation is ca. 2.42 Ga instead, which denotes the age of the oldest glacial event of global extent during the Paleoproterozoic. Therefore, we suggest that the combination of both dating techniques is essential to ensure accurate maximum depositional age constraints for ancient detrital sedimentary rocks. Additionally, our data provides temporal constraints on a period characterized by major fluctuations in atmospheric oxygen. Finally, and supporting the complex nature of the Paleoproterozoic, linkages between widespread glaciations and atmospheric oxygen fluctuations remain to be explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".