U-MSAA-Net: A Multiscale Additive Attention-Based Network for Pixel-Level Identification of Finfish and Krill in Echograms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the detection of finfish and krill in echograms. Finfish, in particular Pacific hake, are used both as human food and fish meal. Krill, harvested for aquaculture and aquariums, are a primary food source for finfish, including hake. Thus, spatial distributions of hake follow that of krill. Stock assessments need an accurate differentiation of krill from finfish (hake) in acoustic echograms. This paper proposes a semantic segmentation paradigm for the pixel-level classification of multi-frequency information to detect co-occurring finfish and krill. This paradigm is highly relevant for identifying cloud-like, diffuse krill aggregations that are intertwined with small, often sparse and sometimes dense schools of finfish. We propose U-MSAA-Net, a deep learning U-Net-like framework with novel multi-scale additive attention (MSAA) modules. MSAA modules allow us to leverage all contextual and local information from feature maps available at any given level of the decoding phase of the network, yielding an efficient suppression of the feature responses from regions with lesser semantic value. Experimental results on a new finfish and krill data set spanning across nine months of acoustic data and covering various situations show that U-MSAA-Net outperforms both traditional, texture-based machine learning methods, and deep learning methods based on state-of-the-art semantic segmentation networks. Additional experiments on a data set containing schools of herring and salmon confirm the versatility of U-MSAA-Net and its superiority in terms of accuracy and ability to detect schools of varying sizes. U-MSAA-Net is the first step in creating a comprehensive tool for stock and ecosystem assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".