Déterminants organisationnels de la santé des travailleurs : une revue systématique de méta-analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malgré de nombreuses études concernant les effets du travail sur la santé des travailleurs, les connaissances à ce sujet restent peu intégrées. Cette étude vise donc à dresser un bilan des connaissances sur les déterminants organisationnels de la santé psychologique et physique pour mieux sélectionner les interventions organisationnelles à implanter. Une revue systématique de méta-analyses a été réalisée ; 163 méta-analyses ont été retenues exposant 791 relations entre les déterminants organisationnels et la santé. Les résultats démontrent un faible effet des déterminants organisationnels recensés sur la santé physique tandis que la culture organisationnelle, renvoyant aux perceptions de justice, de respect et de soutien, de même que le leadership, se révèlent les déterminants ayant les plus forts liens avec la santé psychologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.094 | 0.228 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.015 | 0.039 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".