MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4377005033 · doi:10.26637/mjm303/015

Inclusion properties for certain subclasses of analytic functions defined by using the generalized Bessel functions

2015· article· en· W4377005033 on OpenAlexaff
H. M. Srivastava, K. A. Selvakumaran, Sunıl Dutt Purohıt

Bibliographic record

VenueMalaya Journal of Matematik · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic and geometric function theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBessel functionOperator (biology)MathematicsRegular polygonConvex functionInclusion (mineral)Pure mathematicsAnalytic functionAlgebra over a fieldMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By making use of the operator $B_\nu^c$ defined by the generalized Bessel functions of the first kind, the authors introduce and investigate several new subclasses of starlike, convex, close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions. The authors establish inclusion relationships associated with the aforementioned operator. Some interesting corollaries and consequences of the main inclusion relationships are also considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMalaya Journal of MatematikSame topicAnalytic and geometric function theoryFrench-language works237,207