Conventional IVF vs ICSI in patientts with normal or mild teratozospermic semen samples: A study with sibling oocytes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUmOObjetivo: Comparar as taxas de fertilizao em FIV e ICSI em pacientes normozoosprmicos e teratosprmicos leves.mtodos: Foram estudados 81 casos de pacientes que fizeram o primeiro tratamento de fertilizao in vitro.Se incluiram mulheres 43 anos com 4 oocitos maduros e homens <51 anos.As amostras de semen foram avaliadas segundo a OMS 1999.Estas deviam apresentar uma concentrao >20 x 10 6 spz/ml, mobilidade A25% e mobilidade A+B40%.Foi considerado teratospermia leve os valores de Kruger entre 10 e 13 e normal Kruger 14, os casos foram separados em dois grupos: Grupo 1: K=10-13 e Grupo 2: K14.Para evitar possveis falhas de fertilizao por FIV, os oocitos foram divididos em dois grupos, um deles foi inseminado por FIV e o outro por ICSI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it