La vertu au sein des organisations : une synthèse de la littérature et avenues d’intervention
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malgré les efforts investis pour comprendre les facteurs pouvant nuire à la performance des organisations, tels les comportements de fraude ou de violence, les symptômes de stress ou de dépression, il semblerait que celles-ci soient encore fragiles et les nombreux scandales qui éclatent à travers le monde entier en font preuve. Selon le courant du positive organizational scholarship, le développement de la vertu au sein des organisations pourrait s’avérer une alternative novatrice pour aider les organisations à atteindre un niveau de fonctionnement supérieur. Le présent article propose une recension de la littérature contemporaine de la vertu au sein des organisations, en abordant ses conceptions, formes et principaux résultats. Les principales retombées positives et applications pratiques sont de plus discutées en vue de stimuler l’intérêt pour ce nouveau champ de recherche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it